ICJ Interim loss to South Africa

The term “Plausible” was the lowest bar to pass for the court to continue the case.

In regards to its ICJ interim order. In essence South Africa lost the first round on interim orders because it had asked the ICJ for an order for a ceasefire. This request was rejected. Instead the court ruled in essence that Israel can continue its operation vs Hamas in Gaza but when doing so must do so lawfully, ie not commit genocide & limit as best they can casualties, ( That’s Internationsl Law 101).

The specific orders given refer to the word genocide because South Africa in its application falsely alleges that Israel is committing genocide while at the same time being best buds with Hamas who actually call for the genocide of Jews. If the court had thought that South Africa had provided credible proof that Israel was committing genocide it would have granted the ceasefire request.

Most importantly all judges showed concern for the plight of the Israeli hostages held by Hamas and called for their unconditional release. They also pointed out that Hamas needs to abide by international law.

It is not a win for South Africa. It is an interim win though for those Palestinians who do not support Hamas and certainly for Israel as it can continue its war to root out Hamas from Gaza.